18 Signs You Took High School Way Too Seriously

You worked night and day to get into your dream school, believing that your high school career was the most important thing in the world. When your parents and friends told you to relax and take a breather, you never understood why. Does that sound like you? If so, youll probably recognize these signs:1. Getting an A- is the end of the world. Don’t even bother convincing me it’s okay.2. You didn’t know what life was like outside honor roll. A photo posted by Chynna Cherese Dudley (@ohsweetblindness) on Sep 10, 2015 at 2:43pm PDT 3. School nights are sacred. 4. And you believed weekends were created for you to get ahead on homework. 5. Dating was a waste of time and a distraction you couldn’t afford. 6. Group projects are the worst, because everyone assumes you’ll do all the work. 7. Which is true, so you rather be grouped with people who don’t even try. 8. If you weren’t the president of every club in high school, you were at least on the executive board. 9. In fact, you wish Hermione’s time turner was real, so you dont have to rush to all your commitments. 10. You didn’t get home till 8PM every day, just in time for all the homework you needed to finish. 11. You even ate dinner in the car after varsity practice ended to save time. 12. You feel super guilty about procrastinating on social media for 30 minutes. 13. Teachers stopped calling on you in class to give others a chance. 14. But when it comes to student responsibilities, you’re always the chosen one. 15. No matter how much you study, you still have a breakdown before every test.16. And claim that you didn’t study enough, and you’re going to fail. 17. But of course, you get an A. 18. ...and then college happened! We know youre still getting a 4.0 GPA, but it just doesnt matter to you as much as it used to! Access 60,000+ successfulcollege application filesuploaded by college students (they get paid when you view them). is a community of students helping students. Our goal is to bring much-needed transparency to higher education.

Free Essays on Corrections Essay

In this essay I will attempt to explore the differences between colonial and Jacksonain views on punishment, crime, and incarceration and the social, historical and economic factors that contributed to the shift in ideological thinking. Colonials felt that crime and religion went directly hand and hand. The colonial thought was that you were born a criminal and a crime or sin was a sure sign of the devil. Colonials felt the offender was deemed evil by the devil and therefore could not be treated or rehabilitated. Colonists believed in a self policing strategy, therefore everyone were on look out for a sinner or a criminal. Punishments in the colonial time included fines, whippings, mechanisms of shame, banishment, and for gallows. Often colonists were very narrow minded and cruel. Many colonists felt expulsion was a good means of deterrence â€Å"out of sight out of mind†. There were a large amount of capital offenses and courts were not reluctant to inflict the penalty. Jails did scarcely exist in the colonial period but had only limited functions. They held persons about to be tried or awaiting sentence or unable to discharge contracted debts. Colonist jails closely resembled the household structure and inmates wore no special clothing or uniforms. The inmates brought there own bedding and basically did what they wanted as long as they did not cost the town money. Colonist did not believe a jail could rehabilitate or intimidate or detain the offender. They placed very little faith in the possibility of reform. Between 1790 and 1830 the nation’s population greatly increased, cities became much larger in size and more populated. The growth of manufacturing in the nation sparked the Enlightenment ideas. During the Enlightenment the prior colonial forms of punishment were viewed as barbaric and misdirected. When men no longer knew their place in society self policing became a thing of the past. Jacksonians abolished the death pen... Free Essays on Corrections Essay Free Essays on Corrections Essay In this essay I will attempt to explore the differences between colonial and Jacksonain views on punishment, crime, and incarceration and the social, historical and economic factors that contributed to the shift in ideological thinking. Colonials felt that crime and religion went directly hand and hand. The colonial thought was that you were born a criminal and a crime or sin was a sure sign of the devil. Colonials felt the offender was deemed evil by the devil and therefore could not be treated or rehabilitated. Colonists believed in a self policing strategy, therefore everyone were on look out for a sinner or a criminal. Punishments in the colonial time included fines, whippings, mechanisms of shame, banishment, and for gallows. Often colonists were very narrow minded and cruel. Many colonists felt expulsion was a good means of deterrence â€Å"out of sight out of mind†. There were a large amount of capital offenses and courts were not reluctant to inflict the penalty. Jails did scarcely exist in the colonial period but had only limited functions. They held persons about to be tried or awaiting sentence or unable to discharge contracted debts. Colonist jails closely resembled the household structure and inmates wore no special clothing or uniforms. The inmates brought there own bedding and basically did what they wanted as long as they did not cost the town money. Colonist did not believe a jail could rehabilitate or intimidate or detain the offender. They placed very little faith in the possibility of reform. Between 1790 and 1830 the nation’s population greatly increased, cities became much larger in size and more populated. The growth of manufacturing in the nation sparked the Enlightenment ideas. During the Enlightenment the prior colonial forms of punishment were viewed as barbaric and misdirected. When men no longer knew their place in society self policing became a thing of the past. Jacksonians abolished the death pen...

Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Pros and Cons of the Death Penalty - Essay Example Many researchers, human rights activist and the Catholic Church argue that death penalty is against human rights, morality and ethical considerations. There are also a large number of people who oppose death penalty because of the cruel inhuman way it is administered. In this respect, James Coleman observes that the application of the death penalty today in the American judicial system is quite arbitrary and inconsistent (The Death Penalty: Arbitrariness and the Death Penalty). Similarly, Coleman, citing the famous Lockett v. Ohio in 1978, goes on to argue that the ultimate decision of the jury to impose the death penalty is usually followed by the defendant’s opportunity to plead for mercy. It is also a fact that there are many deserving defendants who are eligible for the death penalty but escape the capital punishment and vice versa which pose a number of questions on the amount of fairness in administering death penalty. Even when the advocates of death penalty hold that i t should be imposed ‘fairly and with reasonable consistency’ despite the legal formulas and procedural rules â€Å"the death penalty remains fraught with arbitrariness, discrimination...and mistake† (The Death Penalty: Pro and Con).

An issue affecting two or more countries Article

An issue affecting two or more countries - Article Example While CIA provided information from the satellites about abandoned soviet trucks and weapon depots for the Taliban, ISI transferred the information to the men on ground (Coll p. 291) making it possible for the Taliban to conquer Afghanistan with astonishing speed uniting the country for the benefit of Pakistan, United States and Saudi Arabia (Reeve p. 191). After the September 11 attacks, US invaded the Taliban controlled Afghanistan asking all countries to cut off Taliban support. Pakistan ordered the Taliban embassy to be closed in 2001, allied with the US and supported the invasion by providing its forward military bases. The hard war in Afghanistan followed up by a bloody insurgency caused US to lose unprecedented amount of war founds trying to control Afghan territory. Adding to the troubles were lack of understanding of terrain and psyche of the local people. The overwhelming force and technology, while allowed the US to have complete air superiority and highly reinforced milit ary bases in the region, could still not help them achieve actual victory and control over the territory outside their bases. The insurgency caused alot of contention between USA and Pakistan as allies and the US still ended up blaming Pakistan for supporting Afghan Taliban after calling it their top non-NATO ally. This paper compares and contrasts BBC reports and The Washington Post with respect to the US allegations and Pakistani denials. BBC reports Pakistan being accused of playing a double game by the US (Collyns). After interviewing a few prisoners, according to BBC, the US officials concluded that Pakistan was actively supporting Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan for a hidden agenda. This can be seen as a fallacy of composition created from a single point of view being viewed as the resulting aim of country’s net actions. Pakistani ISI has been a powerful element both in the country and in its defense against the enemy powers when it came to proxy wars. The BBC uses th e circumstantial prisoner witnesses to support the accusation by the US officials. While attributing repeated denials to Pakistan in two instances, the report suggests the US accusations overly weighed and further states them as a fact by presenting a BBC documentary to back up the accusations as facts. This strains the neutral point of view of the report which should be there in an international news article fully attributing views to their actual sources and not stating contentions opinions or conflicting truths as facts. Furthermore, in addition to the US accusations, the BBC report itself alleges that Pakistan has helped and harboured Afghan Taliban in its territory stating it as a ‘plain to see’ fact (Collyns). The Washington Post, on the other hand, also attributes accusations to the US and denials to Pakistan but keeps it to that (Leiby). The report can be contrasted with that of BBC’s in a clear cut way. As a clear contrast to the BBC report, this report presents quotations of US accusations in text with conflicting quotations of Pakistani denials making it more balanced and neutral in its point of view. The Washington Post report also uses the BBC report as a reference but puts it in a more neutral way without any presumptions. The BBC excerpts are quoted to tell the US side of the story while the Pakistani foreign minister is clearly attributed to have categorically put

Stereotypes of Culture Essay Example for Free

Stereotypes of Culture Essay This essay aims to explore benefits and disadvantages for managers to use sophisticated stereotypes. Stereotypes provide international managers an advantage of ‘first guess’ about cultural behaviors in countries and organizations so that they can develop appropriate strategies to cope with cross-cultural problems. However, it causes three drawbacks. If stereotyping is judging a group of people on the basis of theoretical concepts, it will be called ‘sophisticated stereotyping’ (Osland and Bird, 2000). The greatest benefit is sophisticated stereotype offers basic cultural knowledge, and is useful for managers to guess about cultural behavior in a country. Therefore, it is used as assistant tool in building unitary organizational cultures. The tourist firm relied on Hosftede’s framework. Because Japanese are collectivistic while Danish are individualistic, the Danish director had to consider whether provide guidance to Danish staffs or strict control to Japanese staffs, instead using individual competencies for all employees. Another example, the audio-visual firm took a chance of gender differentiation between Denmark and Japan to recruit suitable talents for their Tokyo office because it knows Japanese prefer masculine values. Hence it can say that sophisticated stereotypes can be a helpful weapon in implementing cultural management strategies. In contrast, sophisticated stereotypes cannot capture paradox which is the first disadvantage. In particular, if there are no exact cultures as described, people who depend on generalization studies cultural barriers will get confused. However, people who are acquired with cultural differences via their knowledge and experiences will be able to foresee what is most important and the best thing to do in foreign countries. Second, theoretical studies in national cultures are not sufficient to intercultural business context because international business embraced various cultures across borders. However, such scholars as Hofstede, Hampden-Turner and Trompenaars, Hall have studied in a single-national culture. Furthermore, sophisticated stereotypes do not describe potential cultural changes in intercultural encounters. These scholars had conducted researches for at least 19 years ago. Corporate cultures might change over time as a consequence of changes in perception and modern societies. In this case, national generalizations are useless to fit to intercultural encounters. Thus, managers merely gain insight into multi-cultural management by their experience and new approaches. In conclusion, because of above risks, sophisticated stereotypes merely are useful at the starting point for managers to guess cultural behaviors. Moving beyond sophisticated stereotypes, they need to make incremental changes by using their own knowledge to manage cultural issues.

Andrew Carnegie :: essays research papers

Andrew Carnegie was not only an outstanding industrialist, but also a great philanthropist. In the excerpt from page 105, Carnegie is stating that an end to Individualism would result in a revolution not an evolution because it is changing human nature itself, and there would be no way to know if it would even be a change for the better. This excerpt was one trying to convey a communist utopia; a policy of working for the better of each other, not just for the individual alone.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  This concept of ending Individualism and beginning one class of people, is one that arises with each leader (especially communist) trying to change a society during this period of history. I don’t believe, however, that Andrew Carnegie was trying to become a leader or begin a revolution. He was strictly stating his opinions on wealth and in turn giving that wealth away. Carnegie was a man of many contradictions. He was the wealthiest human being of all time, and he was convinced of the value of poverty in developing character.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In Carnegie’s later life, I believe he had realized his selfishness with his wealth and felt the need to give it away. In the excerpt, I feel he was assessing his own situation of wealth and was trying to encourage the rest of mankind to not live the type of life he had experienced. He stated, â€Å"it is a nobler ideal that man should labor, not for himself alone, but in and for a brotherhood of his fellows, and share with them all in common†¦Ã¢â‚¬  I sense that the reason he made this statement was to encourage mankind to give away their wealth and not hold it for their own possession. Carnegie felt that society should work together instead of individually.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In many ways I agree with his statement, but I don’t feel that this is a feasible concept. Individualism is something I wouldn’t want taken away from me because I wouldn’t be able to have that constant desire to better myself.

Evil in the Environment Essay

John Locke is a philosopher known for introducing various significant concepts to different fields of studies. His work encompasses the fields of psychology, political science, and philosophy. One of his main contributions is his assertion that the human mind is completely empirical.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   This principle would lead one to believe that every human being is born into this world having the same capacity. All human minds are empty slates (tabula rasa) when one is just born. (Hooker, 1999) Behavior is acquired through the various empirical experiences that a human being undergoes. Moral behavior stems from an individual’s empirical experiences. (Hooker, 1999) As such, it can be assumed that all immoral behavior or all â€Å"evil† is the product of the environment rather than individual. (Hooker, 1999) Such line of reasoning will lead us to assume that evil from the environment can be eradicated by a simple change in human thinking and behavior. This is known as the third â€Å"premise† of the enlightenment thinkers.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   The said premise remains to be significant in today’s time and age. For one, it helps people today realize that the evil that pervades in society today can be erased by humans themselves. Moreover, it teaches society that there is still hope for a better world and the fulfillment of such dreams lies in the reformation of human beings and society itself.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   The primary effect of such premise on society is that it gives the responsibility for the evil in the world on the shoulders of people. Fingers cannot be pointed to the heavens or to other creatures to blame them for the evil that continues to exist in the world. Rather, the premise asserts that the evil in the world is the product of human misbehavior. Human wrong doing has created the immorality that exists in the world today. However, the most important lesson that Locke’s principle teaches us today is that just as the responsibility for the evil in the world lies in our hands, so does the responsibility to change and eradicate such evil.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   There are many ways by which humans can reform and change their environment. Locke had asserted that education is the primary way by which the moral and intellectual character of the human being can be changed for the better. (Hooker, 1999) Such assertion remains to be significant in today’s society. What the premise tells us is that education is even more valuable today for it is the way by which the world can be made better. Education exists not simply for the betterment of the individual’s own life. It is not for the sole purpose of helping someone find a better job, a better way of life. Education’s primary purpose is to help every human being to determine how he can help make the world a better place. It is through education that society can reform its ways and help remove evil from the environment. Thus, the role of education is society is exemplified by the third â€Å"premise.† The role of education becomes ever more important and significant basing on what has been stated in the premise. The future of today’s society lies in the hands of human beings. The betterment of the world and the eradication of evil are the responsibilities of all human beings. Just as they can create evil, they can erase them. Reformation of one’s ways is the manner by which evil in our â€Å"faulty environment† can be obliterated. Works Cited: Hooker, Richard. Seventeenth Century Enlightenment Thought. 1999. World Civilizations. 12 Dec. 2006 from: http://www.wsu.edu/~dee/ENLIGHT/PREPHIL.HTM.